The acquiescence of the Israel boycott movement and its damning implications

Is the Israel boycott movement's “activism” simply a malicious expression of hatred packaged under the guise of Human Rights concerns?

Why does the Israeli boycott movement turn a blind eye to other causes?
Shlomie Liberow
On 2 July 2012 14:37

The recent shocking, but predictable and inevitable flare up of events in Israel and the brutal murder of an Israeli citizen highlighted the unrelenting attempts by Hamas to threaten the lives of Israeli civilians and forcefully shattered the notion that Hamas was disinterested in engaging in rocket attacks from Gaza.

It further dispelled the myths that Hamas`s overall aggression is simply an expression of tit-for-tat; a reaction, as is constantly disingenuously painted in mainstream media. The narrative proposed is often tainted with an egregious inversion of “victim-aggressor” roles and frames “reactions” as “actions” thus completely ignoring the dynamics of “cause and effect.”

But I believe the biggest lesson to be learned is the reaction, or alarming lack thereof, from the participating audience rather than the players.

Recently I attended the heavily covered and much pondered over performance of “The merchant of Venice” by Tel Aviv’s Habima company at the Shakespeare Globe Theatre. After spending a little time strolling around, I decided to strike up a conversation with a middle-aged women handing out boycott leaflets. I didn’t attempt to steer the conversation to the legitimacy of the boycott and its adverse effect on the facilitation of mutual dialog between the sides. I didn’t attempt to raise the disturbing conduct of the principal organiser -- the Palestine Solidarity Campaign.

Instead I tried to identify the motivational factor and questioned the double-standard as to why there was virtually no opposition raised to the performances just days earlier by China and Russia among other despotic regimes. The response my question elicited centred on the idea that, regardless of the host of raging conflicts at the moment, one cannot have one's fingers in all pies.

Further attempting to justify her position had her mumbling the repeated line, ad infinitum: “Just because there abounds greater evil does not negate the lesser evil.”

Now this claim is inherently specious. To take an analogy: commanding a highly limited police force, one does not go about exclusively dedicating manpower in an effort to tackle Jaywalkers when faced with intensely high murder rates – unless, of course, another issue is at play; perhaps a more cynical, but better fitting explanation of this bizarre behaviour.

This is in no way advancing the absurd notion that Israel is beyond criticism in light of what evil is currently ranging around the world. By all means – engage in constructive criticism because no democracy is beyond reproach. Rather, it's an attempt to drill down and understand the motivation for her special treatment and demonstration of unnerving amount of schadenfreude.

This got me thinking about the many times this very line is thrown around as a blanket indication of impartiality and thus cloaks the incessant, borderline clinical-obsession with Israel in the spirit of global Human Rights concerns. It justifies the lack of action or even basic mobilisation of protests and rallies relating to Syria, Sudan and less chic causes such as the on-going oppression in Zimbabwe, Saudi Arabia and Cuba among the 48 non-free and 60 partly-free countries as rated by Freedom House.

Even if we were to shield ourselves from elementary-level common sense and intentionally blunted our intellectual instruments to accept this illogical narrative, surely all issues relating to the conflict would be game to focus.

But, alas, looking at this week’s news stream relating to Israel, or rather the extreme lack of attention, coupled with deafening silence from “activists” in the face of a reality where over a million Israeli civilians are faced with the threat of a rocket targeting their homes, stores, buses and children in school, one cannot help but focus on the screaming disparity, the pin-drop silence and yes the double standards.

Is it really going overboard to suggest this “activism” is simply a malicious expression of hatred packaged under the guise of Human Rights concerns rather than born out of a deep, genuine concern for the Palestinians? A convenient platform from which to launch a constant avalanche of de-legitimisation activities aimed at demonising Israel whilst accusing the more objective observers of every conceivable evil?

One cannot help but wonder is it Human Rights concerns which tug so intensely on their heartstrings? Is it the innocent children subjected to an environment no child should be exposed to, which drives them? Is it really the image of heavy rocket fire that penetrates their dreams and keeps them tossing and turning at night?

Shlomie Liberow is a Fellow at StandWithUs UK and President of Goldsmiths University Jewish Society

blog comments powered by Disqus