- Let’s be honest. There’s a clear link with Islam (£) by David Aaronovitch, The Times
- Intellectual property is an innovation killer by Joshua Lachkovic , KernalMag
- Dumb Idea Hall of Fame by Aaron David Miller, Foreign Policy
- Nadine Dorries threatens Cameron's Party Leadership by Nadine Dorries, Daily Mail
- Boris set for party leadership? by Traci Watson, USAToday
- Anti-Israel students deface Star of David at student conference by Jonny Paul, Jerusalem Post
- Jihadist Videos on University Facebook by Rupert Sutton, Huffington Post UK
- Skintland: Heads I Win, Tails You Lose by Alex Massie, Spectator UK
- Green tax on conservatories by James Slack and Tamara Cohen, Daily Mail
- Saudi princess: What I'd change about my country by Staff writers, BBC
Throwing Hamas a lifeline
Let us make no bones about it: Hamas is a fascist organisation which mourned the death of Osama bin Laden as an Arab “holy warrior”.
By all accounts, the Hamas-Fatah reconciliation deal took the world completely by surprise. At a moment when support for Hamas among the Palestinians is at an all-time low, and as Syria - its principal patron state - convulses under the pressure of internal unrest and external sanctions, it hardly seems an opportune moment for Fatah to jump into bed with its erstwhile nemesis. So why has it?
The answer lies back in January, when Al-Jazeera leaked thousands of pages of diplomatic correspondence between Palestinian and Israeli negotiators. Outrage erupted on the streets of the West Bank as an indignant Palestinian population learned of the concessions their leaders were prepared to make for the sake of an independent State of Palestine. After decades of fomenting hatred against Israel in order to legitimise its own authoritarian rule, the Fatah-led Palestinian Authority was beginning to reap what it had sown.
Knowing that there could be no settlement arrived at through bilateral talks that would not involve concessions on the Palestinian side, Fatah changed tack. If the Israelis would not give the Palestinian people everything they wanted -- a Palestinian state within the indefensible 1949 armistice lines with East Jerusalem as its capital -- then statehood would have to be achieved through other means. Cue reconciliation.
By adopting a semblance of unity with Hamas, Fatah has killed two birds with one stone. On the one hand it signals to the world that the PA has regained full control over the Palestinian territories, and on the other it has made further negotiations with Israel impossible. Since Israel will not countenance talks with an entity whose raison d'être is genocide, Mahmoud Abbas can pretend he has no option but to break with the Oslo Accords and seek independence unilaterally at the United Nations, which is what the Palestinians want to do in September.
All this talk of "reconciliation" and "unity" is therefore nothing but idealistic guff designed to mask what is essentially a marriage of convenience. But it comes at a heavy cost, and Abbas and his Fatah party are all too shamefully aware that they are making a pact with the devil.
Let us make no bones about it: Hamas is a fascist organisation which mourned the death of Osama bin Laden as an Arab “holy warrior”.
It also rules Gaza with an iron fist. In the midst of the Arab Spring, as ordinary people rise up against their oppressors, Hamas has good reason to be worried. Recent polls suggest that as little as 28 percent of Gazans have a positive view of the regime. The squalid little enclave was ripe for revolution.
Instead, on Fatah's initiative, Hamas has wormed its way back into the patronage of the international community. It now has legitimacy, finances and a foothold on the West Bank. This is bad news for Israelis, bad news for Palestinians, and bad news for peace.
Jacob Campbell is Press Officer for UKIP Friends of Israel. Visit www.ukipfoi.co.uk for more information, or follow @UKIPFOI on Twitter
Print
I am curious as to how you can claim Hamas is a fascist organisation. What elements of fascism does it embody?
Jenny,
Hamas is a nationalist (see: tribalist), militaristic, authoritarian party that wishes to maintain a dictatorship (its reluctance for elections prove it).
It deplores liberty, the rule of law, encourages genocide (regional eugenics) and would never countenance freedom of religion.
That ticks a lot of fascist checkboxes for me. Does it not for you?
The problem I have with this article is the suggestion that Fatah is any better than Hamas. It isn't. As Khaled Abu Toameh has pointed out for years, the Palestinians are stuck between two bad choices because the West blindly supports Fatah because it's less overtly ugly than Hamas and Iran supports Hamas. And the few political alternatives to this ugly pair enjoy very little popular support.






"bad news for peace"? how about "as long as there are Jews and Israel exists in the Middle East, there will be no peace, no matter what deal is signed." I feel that more accurately reflects the situation now and going forward. You can bang on about "peace" until the cows come home, but it ain't happening'. Ever. We're dealing with a)Islam and b)shame and honour culture endemic in Arab countries. Either a) or b) on their own are bad enough, but combine them and you have a recipe for never ending death, war, and misery...