Mitt's big night: Do we have a wide open race?
As the American Ryder Cup team found out at this weekend, it ain't over, until it's over. And right now, this race is far from over
After weeks of anticipation the 2012 presidential debate season began in earnest last night at the University of Denver.
With both sides having sought to lower expectations to such a degree that an ability to walk and chew gum at the same time would be sufficient to declare one pleased with the result, the gloves finally came off as Barack Obama and Mitt Romney met on stage. It is an oft-forgotten fact that the two men at the centre of the election will only meet three times during the entire election process.
Last night's debate focused on domestic policy and as a result was perhaps Mitt Romney's best opportunity to take the fight to the incumbent. With unemployment standing stubbornly at around 8 percent, and the national debt upwards of $16 trillion, this was always going to be the one debate during which Obama may have been on the defensive.
That being the case, few could have expected to what degree. Not usually one to be seen as lacking in confidence, Obama appeared to be in something of a daze last night, as though he couldn't decide which Obama to be.
Often derided for his dependence on an autocue, the president's inherent flaws were on display last night in front of an audience of millions. Alternating between a professorial approach that sought to lecture the American people, and an altogether more contrite and subdued performance, the impression was of a candidate uncertain of his place. One minute he was hectoring the anchor, (who, it must be said, did a poor job of moderating the event) the next he appeared servile and demure in the gaze of his opponent.
In short, the president was badly off his game.
For there can be no doubt that this was Mitt Romney's night. Following an initial concern regarding the haltering tone of voice, Romney quickly found his stride, his tone and his message. He needs to stop flapping his arms around, but this was a minor flaw in an otherwise excellent performance that deliberately took the fight to the incumbent and made a valiant effort to reclaim the middle ground of American politics, where this election will be decided.
Conservative voters may find themselves torn, however. They will no doubt be delighted that Obama had an off-night and pleased in theory that 'their candidate' took the laurels. However, it was not the Mitt Romney of the primary season that appeared on stage last night. This was the Mitt Romney that was Governor of Massachusetts, the Mitt Romney that introduced what became an early model for Obamacare.
Conservative Republicans may not like this, but the Democratic leadership should fear it. As long as Romney was seen to be pandering the right, he was doomed in this election. However, if he can continue to stress the moderate message and bi-partisan track record of achievement, he may yet begin to chip away at the independent voters who will decide this contest.
Last night was Romney's big opportunity and he took it. The question now is, to what effect?
Debates usually favour the challenger and this has proven to be the case once again, but will Romney actually benefit? Races traditionally tighten in the last few weeks, a period we are now entering. It may be too late in the process to secure a Romney victory, but his efforts last night will enhance the pressure on the Obama team and increase the likelihood of mistakes.
If the polls start to narrow in the coming days then Romney can take great credit for a commanding performance in Denver. This could position him well for the debate on foreign affairs, a topic the president is so eager to pivot to that he introduced it in his closing remarks last night.
Indeed, the closing remarks of the candidates were revealing in their own right. Obama, master of the autocue, forget to address the audience at home until the last seconds of his remarks, having focused his response directly to the moderator. As a result, he appeared distracted, unfocused and befuddled.
Romney, in contrast, directed his remarks straight down the camera lens to the millions of voters whom he badly needed to connect with. He gave a direct and forthright statement and of the two candidates, was the only one to thank the voters for bothering to tune in.
It may all be too little, too late for Romney –but he appears determined to go down swinging. The odds and the polling still favour the incumbent. Yet, as the American Ryder Cup team found out at this weekend, it ain't over, until it's over. And right now, this race is far from over.
Indeed, last night's debate may have blown it wide open for the first time.
Dr. James D. Boys is a Contributing Editor to The Commentator. He is a Visiting Senior Research Fellow at King's College London, Associate Professor of International Political Studies at Richmond University in London and a Senior Research Fellow at the Global Policy Institute. Visit his website and follow him on Twitter @jamesdboys
- REVEALED: Claudia Lawrence ‘Mystery Man’ CCTV enhanced in cold case review
- Does socialism work? A classroom experiment
- Why do smart people still choose Keynes over Hayek?
- Russia and Israel: A beautiful friendship?
- Urgent measures needed to rescue hospitality and high streets from irreversible lockdown decline
We are wholly dependent on the kindness of our readers for our continued work. We thank you in advance for any support you can offer.