No great UKIP breakthrough pending according to polls and press
What would constitute a “break through” for UKIP in the county elections?
I have been very tolerant of the UKIP bloggers who regularly use my site to tell us UKIP is about to make a breakthrough. Unlike the supporters of other parties, they also write in a more party partisan way, a course of action more appropriate to confine during elections to proper leaflets under normal election expense rules.
I have been regularly criticised by UKIP supporters for pointing out their lack of electoral success so far in council and parliamentary elections. I argued prior to 2010 the party would not win a single parliamentary seat, even though it fought Buckingham where there was no Conservative, Labour or Lib Dem candidate. It has not won a single by election for Parliament either.
So let me indulge them again, by asking this simple question. What would constitute a “break through” for UKIP in the county elections? How many councils would they need to win outright? How many seats in total would they need to take? Anyone can express a view, as it is the question UKIP has wanted us all to consider.
If UKIP members now think their party will not this time make a break through by winning control of county councils, what would they regard as a good result? Is the main aim in effect to get more councils into Labour hands, by taking more votes from Conservatives than from Labour? How many such results would represent a “UKIP victory”?
This blog originally appeared on johnredwoodsdiary.com
We are wholly dependent on the kindness of our readers for our continued work. We thank you in advance for any support you can offer.