Is underwear a legitimate function of the federal government?
Any government that has $400,000 to spend on a cigarette vest obviously has far too much money on its hands
The spendaholics in Washington have squandered $400,000 on underwear that detects cigarette smoke.
I’m not joking. Here are some details from CNS.
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) has awarded more than $400,000 to a research project involving underwear that can detect when a person smokes cigarettes. …the project…so far has produced a “very early prototype” of the monitoring system, which — in its current state — fits like a vest. …“The modern methods of monitoring smoking, primarily you rely on self-report,” said Dr. Edward Sazonov, an associate professor at the University of Alabama… The PACT Sazonov created is a “very early prototype,” that fits like a vest with multiple straps and wires, far from the “non-invasive, wearable” underwear the project developers had in mind. “It’s not very user friendly,” Sazonov said.
And it’s definitely not taxpayer-friendly either.
Why is Uncle Sam wasting $400,000-plus on ugly and clunky underwear? The excuse for this boondoggle is that it will help monitor whether people smoke. I fail to see how this would promote smoking cessation. I assume 99.99 percent of smokers are aware that they smoke.
Or are we going to have some sort of nanny-state programme with the government forcing people to wear the underwear so the snoops in DC can monitor our private lives.
But even if that type of intrusive system would work, why is smoking any business of the federal government? It’s certainly not one of the enumerated powers in Article I, Section VIII.
This is yet another reason why there shouldn’t be any discussion of tax increases. Any government that has $400,000 to spend on a cigarette vest obviously has far too much money on its hands.
We are wholly dependent on the kindness of our readers for our continued work. We thank you in advance for any support you can offer.