A nasty little lie from the Guardian about Ariel Sharon and Sabra/Shatila massacre
The Guardian is known for its vicious lies about Israel. But on the day Ariel Sharon was buried, this one is right up (down?) there with the worst of them
There is obviously nothing funny about the 1982 massacre in Lebanon of hundreds of mainly Muslim Palestinians at the hands of an Arab Christian militia at the Sabra and Shatila refugee camps.
But, since practically the entire world has blamed the incident on Israel and one Ariel Sharon, it is hard not to chuckle at the way he once characterised the situation following his removal as defence minister, not for carrying out the massacre of course, but for not doing enough to prevent a massacre carried out by others.
"I'm the only minister of defence in the world -- the only one -- who left his post and went back to work on a tractor, on his farm, as a result of what Christians did to Muslims. The only one.”
It's so true, and so piercing because it cuts down to size the flat out liars who have always blamed him for something he just didn't do. It can even get as absurd as this nasty little lie slipped into today's editorial in the Guardian, without question the most bigoted British newspaper when it comes to matters Israeli.
"In 1982, serving as defence minister, he allowed Christian Phalangists into the Palestinian camps of Sabra and Shatila, where they massacred more than 700 men, women and children. An Israeli government inquiry concluded that Mr Sharon bore personal responsibility for the incident," the paper, which is the house journal of the BBC said.
The only way to make sense of this garbage is to conclude that Sharon must have ordered the Phalangists to do it -- which obviously he didn't -- or that he was clairvoyant -- which obviously he wasn't; and knew in advance exactly what was going to happen.
The lie is doubled up with reference to the Israeli government report which simply says he was responsible for not doing enough to stop the incident, not that he actually bore responsibility for what took place. That's why he and several others were held to have had a measure of indirect responsibility, but not to have been responsible for the incident itself.
In other words, the truth is the exact opposite of what the Guardian says it is. And they know it.
The Guardian also knows that less than 1 percent of readers will drill down to get to the truth; and in spreading outright lies, a 99 percent success rate is good enough for them. It's all done of course to discredit, by association, Israel as a whole, because mud sticks.
Oh, you don't think mud sticks?
Let's finish with a question or two. Everyone who has heard of Sabra and Shatila has heard of Ariel Sharon in relation to it. But how many people do you think know the names of the Phalangist leaders who actually commanded, led and carried out the massacre?
Do you know their names? Worth a thought isn't it...?
We are wholly dependent on the kindness of our readers for our continued work. We thank you in advance for any support you can offer.