Fair shares? How progressive a system should Britain have in place?

The Rt Hon John Redwood MP wants to hear from Commentator readers about how progressive a tax system we should have in place. Be sure to leave your views below

9bb9590fd72d485e7917d104474d1c5ba6a17160
How should Britain structure its tax system?
6f37592038ebe4c2dc83c06bb82884256d790fa4
Sir John Redwood MP
On 13 December 2011 11:55

We spend much of our time on this site discussing policies that could promote more growth, more jobs and greater prosperity. Most agree that a growing economy can offer more opportunities, and can lift prospects and living standards for many.

There is a considerable effort put into the alternative debate: the discussion of how you should distribute all the income and wealth we do have, whatever the growth rate. 

The politics of fair shares is especially popular at times of low or no growth. All elected MPs in the UK accept that there should be a progressive tax system, which takes more tax from the rich and less tax from the poor. All accept there should be a benefit system to give more state money to those who are ill, disabled, elderly, or unable to find a job.

I wish to explore this issue a bit more this week. I will be commenting on the degree of progression in our tax system, and the state of our benefit system. We need to look at Mr Duncan Smith’s proposed welfare reforms to make work more worthwhile. We need to ask if it was right to raise out of work benefits by inflation, when wages are rising by less.

I would be interested today in hearing from Commentator readers about how progressive a system you think we should have in place.

How much more tax should someone on £100,000 a year pay compared with someone on £30,000? Should benefits only be paid to people on lower incomes? If so what should the cut off levels be? Or should some benefits go to all taxpayers as of right? 

Is means testing the fairest way of limiting taxpayer bills, or should the prudent, on moderate incomes, also be able to receive money from the state? Do means tested benefits send perverse incentives? Does it make any sense to pay universal benefits, so millionaires end up with payments? And should bankers pay more tax on their bonuses than footballers pay on their incomes?

Editor's note: please leave comments for the Rt Hon John Redwood MP below.

The Rt Hon John Redwood MP is the Member of UK Parliament for Wokingham and the Chairman of the Conservative Economic Affairs Committee. He will be speaking at the Bow Group Christmas Reception this Thursday - you can register here. His articles are cross-posted on his blog by agreement

Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus